The Bloch Ball & Purity

3.5 hours ~9 min read

The Bloch Ball & Purity

In Course 1.2 you learned that every pure qubit state lives on the surface of the Bloch sphere. Density matrices complete the picture: every qubit state — pure or mixed — is a point in the solid Bloch ball. Pure states are the skin (r=1|\vec r| = 1), mixed states fill the interior, and the maximally mixed state I/2I/2 sits dead center. This is not a cute analogy: the entire single-qubit state space is a unit ball in R3\mathbb R^3, the algebra is an exact dictionary ρr\rho\leftrightarrow\vec r, and purity is a one-line function of the radius. It is the geometry you will reason with for every qubit noise channel in Term 4.

Learning Objectives

After this lesson you will be able to:

  1. Derive the single-qubit form ρ=12(I+rσ)\rho = \tfrac12(I + \vec r\cdot\vec\sigma) from Hermiticity and unit trace using the Pauli basis.
  2. Identify the Bloch vector r=(X,Y,Z)\vec r = (\langle X\rangle, \langle Y\rangle, \langle Z\rangle) and recover it from ρ\rho via rk=Tr(ρσk)r_k = \operatorname{Tr}(\rho\,\sigma_k).
  3. Prove the constraint r1|\vec r|\le 1 from positivity, and that r=1|\vec r| = 1 iff ρ\rho is pure.
  4. Derive the purity identity Tr(ρ2)=12(1+r2)\operatorname{Tr}(\rho^2) = \tfrac12(1 + |\vec r|^2) and use it to classify states.
  5. Connect the Bloch ball to the pure-state Bloch sphere of Course 1.2, mapping mixed states inward toward the center.

Intuition

A single qubit's density matrix is a 2×22\times2 Hermitian matrix with trace 11. Count its real degrees of freedom: a 2×22\times2 Hermitian matrix has 44 real parameters (two real diagonal entries, one complex off-diagonal), and fixing the trace to 11 removes one — leaving exactly 33. Three real numbers, one constraint to keep eigenvalues nonnegative: that is precisely the data of a point inside a ball in R3\mathbb R^3. The Pauli matrices {I,X,Y,Z}\{I, X, Y, Z\} are the natural axes for that space, and the three coordinates are the expectation values $\langle X\rangle, \langle Y\rangle, \langle Z\rangle$ — directly measurable.

Geometrically: pure states are the extreme points of the convex state set (Lesson 1), and the extreme points of a ball are its surface — the sphere of Course 1.2. Mixing pure states means taking convex combinations, which move you inside the ball. The deepest interior point, reachable from every antipodal pair 12n^n^+12n^n^\tfrac12|\hat n\rangle\langle\hat n| + \tfrac12|{-}\hat n\rangle\langle{-}\hat n|, is the center I/2I/2 — maximal mixing, total ignorance. Purity, which Lesson 1 defined abstractly, becomes literally "how far from the center are you," squared.


Theory

Deriving ρ=12(I+rσ)\rho = \tfrac12(I + \vec r\cdot\vec\sigma)

We use the key fact from Appendix E §1: the Pauli set {I,X,Y,Z}\{I, X, Y, Z\} is an orthogonal basis for the real vector space of 2×22\times2 Hermitian matrices, under the Hilbert–Schmidt inner product A,B=Tr(AB)\langle A, B\rangle = \operatorname{Tr}(A^\dagger B), with

Tr(I)=2,Tr(σj)=0,Tr(σjσk)=2δjk(j,k{x,y,z}). \operatorname{Tr}(I) = 2,\quad \operatorname{Tr}(\sigma_j) = 0,\quad \operatorname{Tr}(\sigma_j\sigma_k) = 2\delta_{jk}\quad (j,k\in\{x,y,z\}).

Step 1 — Hermiticity gives a real Pauli expansion. Since ρ=ρ\rho = \rho^\dagger (Lesson 1) and any 2×22\times2 Hermitian matrix is a real linear combination of the Pauli basis, write

ρ=a0I+axX+ayY+azZ,a0,ax,ay,azR. \rho = a_0 I + a_x X + a_y Y + a_z Z, \qquad a_0, a_x, a_y, a_z \in \mathbb R .

(Reality of the coefficients is exactly what Hermiticity buys: X,Y,ZX, Y, Z are Hermitian, and a complex coefficient on a Hermitian matrix would break ρ=ρ\rho^\dagger = \rho.)

Step 2 — Unit trace fixes a0a_0. Take the trace of both sides and use $\operatorname{Tr}\sigma_j = 0$:

1=Trρ=a0Tr(I)+0=2a0    a0=12. 1 = \operatorname{Tr}\rho = a_0\operatorname{Tr}(I) + 0 = 2a_0 \;\Longrightarrow\; a_0 = \tfrac12 .

Step 3 — extract the Pauli coefficients by orthogonality. Multiply ρ\rho by σk\sigma_k and trace, using Tr(σjσk)=2δjk\operatorname{Tr}(\sigma_j\sigma_k) = 2\delta_{jk} and Tr(Iσk)=0\operatorname{Tr}(I\sigma_k) = 0:

Tr(ρσk)=a0Tr(σk)0+jajTr(σjσk)2δjk=2ak    ak=12Tr(ρσk). \operatorname{Tr}(\rho\,\sigma_k) = a_0\underbrace{\operatorname{Tr}(\sigma_k)}_{0} + \sum_j a_j\underbrace{\operatorname{Tr}(\sigma_j\sigma_k)}_{2\delta_{jk}} = 2a_k \;\Longrightarrow\; a_k = \tfrac12\operatorname{Tr}(\rho\,\sigma_k) .

Step 4 — name the coordinates. By the expectation formula A=Tr(ρA)\langle A\rangle = \operatorname{Tr}(\rho A) of Lesson 1, Tr(ρσk)=σk\operatorname{Tr}(\rho\,\sigma_k) = \langle\sigma_k\rangle. Define the Bloch vector rk:=σk=Tr(ρσk)r_k := \langle\sigma_k\rangle = \operatorname{Tr}(\rho\,\sigma_k), so ak=12rka_k = \tfrac12 r_k. Substituting a0=12a_0 = \tfrac12 and ak=12rka_k = \tfrac12 r_k:

  ρ=12(I+rσ)=12(I+rxX+ryY+rzZ),r=(X,Y,Z)   \boxed{\;\rho = \tfrac12\big(I + \vec r\cdot\vec\sigma\big) = \tfrac12\big(I + r_x X + r_y Y + r_z Z\big),\qquad \vec r = \big(\langle X\rangle, \langle Y\rangle, \langle Z\rangle\big)\;}

This is an exact, invertible dictionary: every qubit density matrix \leftrightarrow a vector rR3\vec r\in\mathbb R^3. Writing it out as a matrix,

ρ=12(1+rzrxiryrx+iry1rz). \rho = \frac12\begin{pmatrix} 1 + r_z & r_x - i r_y \\ r_x + i r_y & 1 - r_z \end{pmatrix} .

The diagonal carries the ZZ-statistics (P(0)=1+rz2P(0) = \tfrac{1+r_z}{2}, P(1)=1rz2P(1) = \tfrac{1-r_z}{2}) and the off-diagonal carries the X,YX, Y coherences.

The positivity constraint: r1|\vec r|\le 1

Hermiticity and unit trace are automatic in the parametrization; the remaining requirement, ρ0\rho\succeq0, is what carves out the ball.

Proposition. ρ=12(I+rσ)\rho = \tfrac12(I + \vec r\cdot\vec\sigma) is a valid density operator (i.e. ρ0\rho\succeq0) iff r1|\vec r|\le 1.

Proof. A 2×22\times2 Hermitian matrix is positive semidefinite iff Trρ0\operatorname{Tr}\rho\ge0 and detρ0\det\rho\ge0 (then both eigenvalues are 0\ge0). The trace is 1>01>0, so positivity reduces to detρ0\det\rho\ge0. Compute the determinant from the matrix form:

detρ=14[(1+rz)(1rz)(rxiry)(rx+iry)]=14[1rz2(rx2+ry2)]=14(1r2). \det\rho = \frac14\big[(1 + r_z)(1 - r_z) - (r_x - i r_y)(r_x + i r_y)\big] = \frac14\big[1 - r_z^2 - (r_x^2 + r_y^2)\big] = \frac14\big(1 - |\vec r|^2\big).

Hence detρ0    r21    r1\det\rho\ge0 \iff |\vec r|^2\le 1 \iff |\vec r|\le 1. ∎

So the single-qubit state space is exactly the closed unit ball ${\vec r\in\mathbb R^3 : |\vec r|\le1}theBlochball.Theeigenvaluesfalloutofthesamecomputation:from — the **Bloch ball**. The eigenvalues fall out of the same computation: from \operatorname{Tr}\rho = \lambda_+ + \lambda_- = 1and and \det\rho = \lambda_+\lambda_- = \tfrac14(1 - |\vec r|^2)$,

λ±=1±r2  [0,1], \lambda_\pm = \frac{1 \pm |\vec r|}{2}\;\in[0,1],

which are manifestly valid probabilities precisely when r1|\vec r|\le1.

Pure on the sphere, mixed inside, maximally mixed at the center

The eigenvalues λ±=1±r2\lambda_\pm = \tfrac{1\pm|\vec r|}{2} instantly classify every qubit state by radius:

| r|\vec r| | Eigenvalues λ±\lambda_\pm | State | |---|---|---| | r=1|\vec r| = 1 (surface) | 1,01, 0 | pure | | 0<r<10 < |\vec r| < 1 (interior) | 1±r2\tfrac{1\pm|\vec r|}{2}, both in (0,1)(0,1) | mixed | | r=0|\vec r| = 0 (center) | 12,12\tfrac12, \tfrac12 | maximally mixed, ρ=I/2\rho = I/2 |

Pure ⟺ surface. ρ\rho is pure iff r=1|\vec r| = 1.

Proof. ρ\rho pure     \iff one eigenvalue is 11 and the other 00 (Lesson 1)     λ+=1\iff \lambda_+ = 1, i.e. 1+r2=1    r=1\tfrac{1+|\vec r|}{2} = 1 \iff |\vec r| = 1. ∎ At the center r=0\vec r = \vec 0, the formula gives ρ=12I\rho = \tfrac12 I directly — the maximally mixed state of Lessons 1–2 (and the Bell reduced state).

This is the Bloch sphere of Course 1.2, now seen as a boundary. There, a pure qubit ψ=cosθ20+eiϕsinθ21|\psi\rangle = \cos\tfrac\theta2|0\rangle + e^{i\phi}\sin\tfrac\theta2|1\rangle sits at the unit-sphere point r^=(sinθcosϕ,sinθsinϕ,cosθ)\hat r = (\sin\theta\cos\phi, \sin\theta\sin\phi, \cos\theta); you can check X=sinθcosϕ\langle X\rangle = \sin\theta\cos\phi, etc., so that r^\hat r is exactly the Bloch vector with r^=1|\hat r| = 1. Density matrices add the radial direction: the interior. A mixed state with Bloch vector r=rn^\vec r = |\vec r|\,\hat n (0r<10\le|\vec r|<1) points in the same direction n^\hat n as the pure state on the surface but is "shrunk" toward the center by the factor r|\vec r| — the geometric meaning of decoherence.

Purity as a quadratic in the radius

Finally, the abstract purity of Lesson 1 becomes a clean function of r|\vec r|.

Purity–radius identity.

Tr(ρ2)=12(1+r2). \operatorname{Tr}(\rho^2) = \tfrac12\big(1 + |\vec r|^2\big).

Proof (algebraic). Square the parametrization and expand using (rσ)2=r2I(\vec r\cdot\vec\sigma)^2 = |\vec r|^2 I — which follows from σjσk=δjkI+iεjklσl\sigma_j\sigma_k = \delta_{jk}I + i\varepsilon_{jkl}\sigma_l (Appendix E §1): the symmetric sum kills the antisymmetric ε\varepsilon term, leaving $\sum_{jk}r_j r_k\sigma_j\sigma_k = \sum_{jk}r_j r_k\delta_{jk}I = |\vec r|^2 I$. Then

ρ2=14(I+rσ)2=14(I+2rσ+(rσ)2)=14((1+r2)I+2rσ). \rho^2 = \tfrac14\big(I + \vec r\cdot\vec\sigma\big)^2 = \tfrac14\big(I + 2\,\vec r\cdot\vec\sigma + (\vec r\cdot\vec\sigma)^2\big) = \tfrac14\big((1 + |\vec r|^2)I + 2\,\vec r\cdot\vec\sigma\big).

Take the trace, using Tr(I)=2\operatorname{Tr}(I) = 2 and Tr(rσ)=0\operatorname{Tr}(\vec r\cdot\vec\sigma) = 0:

Tr(ρ2)=14((1+r2)2+0)=12(1+r2). \operatorname{Tr}(\rho^2) = \tfrac14\big((1 + |\vec r|^2)\cdot 2 + 0\big) = \tfrac12\big(1 + |\vec r|^2\big). \qquad\blacksquare

Consistency check (eigenvalues). $\operatorname{Tr}(\rho^2) = \lambda_+^2 + \lambda_-^2 = \big(\tfrac{1+|\vec r|}{2}\big)^2 + \big(\tfrac{1-|\vec r|}{2}\big)^2 = \tfrac{2 + 2|\vec r|^2}{4} = \tfrac12(1 + |\vec r|^2).TheidentityreproducesLesson1sboundsfor. ✓ The identity reproduces Lesson 1's bounds for d = 2:at: at |\vec r| = 1$, purity =1= 1 (pure); at r=0|\vec r| = 0, purity =12=1/d= \tfrac12 = 1/d (maximally mixed). Purity is a monotonic dial on the radius — knowing Trρ2\operatorname{Tr}\rho^2 is equivalent to knowing $|\vec r| = \sqrt{2\operatorname{Tr}(\rho^2) - 1}$, the distance from center.


Worked Examples

Example 1 — From ρ\rho to r\vec r to classification

Let \rho = \begin{psmallmatrix} 3/4 & 1/4 \\ 1/4 & 1/4 \end{psmallmatrix} (Hermitian, trace 11). Read off the Bloch vector via rk=Tr(ρσk)r_k = \operatorname{Tr}(\rho\,\sigma_k), or directly by matching to the matrix form \rho = \tfrac12\begin{psmallmatrix}1+r_z & r_x - ir_y\\ r_x + ir_y & 1 - r_z\end{psmallmatrix}:

1+rz2=34rz=12,rxiry2=14rx=12, ry=0. \tfrac{1+r_z}{2} = \tfrac34 \Rightarrow r_z = \tfrac12,\qquad \tfrac{r_x - i r_y}{2} = \tfrac14 \Rightarrow r_x = \tfrac12,\ r_y = 0 .

So r=(12,0,12)\vec r = (\tfrac12, 0, \tfrac12) and $|\vec r| = \sqrt{\tfrac14 + \tfrac14} = \tfrac1{\sqrt2}\approx 0.707 < 1$ — a mixed interior state. Purity:

Tr(ρ2)=12(1+r2)=12(1+12)=34. \operatorname{Tr}(\rho^2) = \tfrac12(1 + |\vec r|^2) = \tfrac12\big(1 + \tfrac12\big) = \tfrac34 .

Cross-check directly: $\rho^2 = \begin{psmallmatrix}3/4&1/4\1/4&1/4\end{psmallmatrix}^2 = \begin{psmallmatrix}10/16 & 4/16\ 4/16 & 2/16\end{psmallmatrix},trace, trace = \tfrac{12}{16} = \tfrac34$. ✓ Eigenvalues λ±=1±1/220.854,0.146\lambda_\pm = \tfrac{1\pm1/\sqrt2}{2}\approx 0.854,\,0.146, both in (0,1)(0,1) — consistent with "mixed."

Example 2 — Decoherence as radial shrinkage

Start from the pure equator state +|+\rangle, with r=(1,0,0)\vec r = (1, 0, 0) on the surface ($\langle X\rangle = 1,therest, the rest 0$). Suppose a dephasing process (Term 4 preview) damps the off-diagonal coherence by a factor p[0,1]p\in[0,1]:

ρp=(12p2p212)=12(I+pX),r=(p,0,0). \rho_p = \begin{pmatrix} \tfrac12 & \tfrac{p}{2}\\[2pt] \tfrac{p}{2} & \tfrac12 \end{pmatrix} = \tfrac12\big(I + p\,X\big), \qquad \vec r = (p, 0, 0).

The Bloch vector keeps its direction x^\hat x but its length collapses from 11 to pp: the state slides straight in from the surface point +|+\rangle toward the center along the xx-axis. Purity tracks the radius exactly:

Tr(ρp2)=12(1+p2), \operatorname{Tr}(\rho_p^2) = \tfrac12(1 + p^2),

falling from 11 (pure +|+\rangle, p=1p = 1) to 12\tfrac12 (maximally mixed, p=0p = 0). This single picture — coherence loss = radial shrinkage = purity decrease — is the geometric heart of how noise acts on a qubit, and you will meet it formally as the dephasing channel in Term 4.


Hands-on (Python)

We build the exact ρr\rho\leftrightarrow\vec r dictionary both directions, compute purity from the radius, and classify states.

import numpy as np

I = np.eye(2, dtype=complex)
X = np.array([[0, 1], [1, 0]], dtype=complex)
Y = np.array([[0, -1j], [1j, 0]], dtype=complex)
Z = np.array([[1, 0], [0, -1]], dtype=complex)
PAULI = [X, Y, Z]

def bloch_vector(rho):
    """r_k = Tr(ρ σ_k) = ⟨σ_k⟩, for k = x, y, z.  (Real for a valid state.)"""
    return np.array([np.trace(rho @ s).real for s in PAULI])

def density_from_bloch(r):
    """ρ = ½ (I + r·σ).  Valid density matrix iff |r| ≤ 1."""
    rx, ry, rz = r
    return 0.5 * (I + rx * X + ry * Y + rz * Z)

def purity(rho):
    return np.trace(rho @ rho).real
# Round-trip the dictionary: ρ -> r -> ρ.
rho = np.array([[3/4, 1/4], [1/4, 1/4]], dtype=complex)   # Worked Example 1
r = bloch_vector(rho)
print("Bloch vector r =", np.round(r, 4))                 # [0.5  0.   0.5]
print("round-trip ok?", np.allclose(density_from_bloch(r), rho))  # True

print("|r| =", round(np.linalg.norm(r), 4))               # 0.7071
print("purity (from radius) =", 0.5 * (1 + np.linalg.norm(r)**2))  # 0.75
print("purity (direct)      =", round(purity(rho), 4))    # 0.75  -> identity confirmed
def classify(rho, tol=1e-9):
    """Classify a single-qubit state by its Bloch radius."""
    r_norm = np.linalg.norm(bloch_vector(rho))
    if r_norm > 1 + tol:
        return "INVALID (|r| > 1, not positive semidefinite)"
    if abs(r_norm - 1) <= tol:
        return "pure (on the Bloch sphere)"
    if r_norm <= tol:
        return "maximally mixed (center, I/2)"
    return "mixed (inside the Bloch ball)"

states = {
    "|0⟩":        density_from_bloch([0, 0, 1]),     # north pole, pure
    "|+⟩":        density_from_bloch([1, 0, 0]),     # equator, pure
    "I/2":        density_from_bloch([0, 0, 0]),     # center, maximally mixed
    "WE1 mixed":  np.array([[3/4, 1/4], [1/4, 1/4]], dtype=complex),
}
for name, rho in states.items():
    print(f"{name:10s} |r|={np.linalg.norm(bloch_vector(rho)):.3f}  "
          f"purity={purity(rho):.3f}  -> {classify(rho)}")
# Decoherence as radial shrinkage (Worked Example 2): |+⟩ dephasing toward center.
for p in [1.0, 0.7, 0.3, 0.0]:
    rho_p = density_from_bloch([p, 0, 0])             # ρ = ½(I + p X)
    print(f"p={p:.1f}  |r|={p:.1f}  purity={purity(rho_p):.3f}  "
          f"(= ½(1+p²) = {0.5*(1+p*p):.3f})")
# Coherence damps -> Bloch vector shrinks along x -> purity falls 1.0 → 0.5.

# A point with |r| > 1 is NOT a valid state (eigenvalue would be negative):
bad = density_from_bloch([1.0, 1.0, 0.0])             # |r| = √2 > 1
print("eigvals of an invalid 'state':", np.round(np.linalg.eigvalsh(bad), 3))  # one < 0

Geometry, not metaphor. bloch_vector and density_from_bloch are exact inverses on valid states — the Bloch ball is a faithful coordinate system for the qubit, not a visualization aid. Every single-qubit noise channel in Term 4 is, geometrically, an affine map of the ball (a shrink + shift of r\vec r); having the dictionary in code means you can read off purity and validity for any of them with the functions above.


Exercises

E1 (easy). Find the Bloch vectors of 0|0\rangle, 1|1\rangle, +|+\rangle, |-\rangle, +i|{+}i\rangle, i|{-}i\rangle. Confirm each has r=1|\vec r| = 1.

Solution

Using rk=σkr_k = \langle\sigma_k\rangle (or matching matrices): 0(0,0,1)|0\rangle\to(0,0,1), 1(0,0,1)|1\rangle\to(0,0,-1), +(1,0,0)|+\rangle\to(1,0,0), (1,0,0)|-\rangle\to(-1,0,0), +i(0,1,0)|{+}i\rangle\to(0,1,0), i(0,1,0)|{-}i\rangle\to(0,-1,0). These are the six poles of the three Pauli axes (Appendix C), each with r=1|\vec r| = 1 — all pure, all on the sphere, as expected.

E2 (easy). A qubit has Bloch vector r=(0,0,0.6)\vec r = (0, 0, 0.6). Write ρ\rho as a matrix, compute its purity two ways, and classify it.

Solution

\rho = \tfrac12(I + 0.6\,Z) = \begin{psmallmatrix}0.8 & 0\\ 0 & 0.2\end{psmallmatrix}. Purity from the radius: 12(1+0.36)=0.68\tfrac12(1 + 0.36) = 0.68. Directly: 0.82+0.22=0.64+0.04=0.680.8^2 + 0.2^2 = 0.64 + 0.04 = 0.68. ✓ Since 0<r=0.6<10 < |\vec r| = 0.6 < 1, it is a mixed interior state (eigenvalues 0.8,0.20.8, 0.2).

E3 (medium). Prove that the eigenvalues of ρ=12(I+rσ)\rho = \tfrac12(I + \vec r\cdot\vec\sigma) are 1±r2\tfrac{1\pm|\vec r|}{2}, and use this to re-derive $\operatorname{Tr}(\rho^2) = \tfrac12(1 + |\vec r|^2)$.

Solution

rσ=r(n^σ)\vec r\cdot\vec\sigma = |\vec r|(\hat n\cdot\vec\sigma) with n^=r/r\hat n = \vec r/|\vec r|, and (n^σ)2=I(\hat n\cdot\vec\sigma)^2 = I (from (rσ)2=r2I(\vec r\cdot\vec\sigma)^2 = |\vec r|^2 I), so n^σ\hat n\cdot\vec\sigma has eigenvalues ±1\pm1. Hence rσ\vec r\cdot\vec\sigma has eigenvalues ±r\pm|\vec r|, and $\rho = \tfrac12(I + \vec r\cdot\vec\sigma)haseigenvalues has eigenvalues \tfrac{1\pm|\vec r|}{2}.Then. Then \operatorname{Tr}(\rho^2) = \big(\tfrac{1+|\vec r|}{2}\big)^2 + \big(\tfrac{1-|\vec r|}{2}\big)^2 = \tfrac{2 + 2|\vec r|^2}{4} = \tfrac12(1 + |\vec r|^2)$. ∎

E4 (medium). Show that the Bloch vector of a 50/50 mixture of two pure states with Bloch vectors a\vec a, b\vec b (both on the sphere) is 12(a+b)\tfrac12(\vec a + \vec b), and that the result is pure iff a=b\vec a = \vec b. Interpret geometrically.

Solution

If ρa=12(I+aσ)\rho_a = \tfrac12(I + \vec a\cdot\vec\sigma) and ρb=12(I+bσ)\rho_b = \tfrac12(I + \vec b\cdot\vec\sigma), then ρ=12ρa+12ρb=12(I+a+b2σ)\rho = \tfrac12\rho_a + \tfrac12\rho_b = \tfrac12\big(I + \tfrac{\vec a + \vec b}{2}\cdot\vec\sigma\big), so the mixture's Bloch vector is the midpoint r=12(a+b)\vec r = \tfrac12(\vec a + \vec b) — convex mixing of states is convex combination of Bloch vectors (the map is affine). With a=b=1|\vec a| = |\vec b| = 1, r=12a+b=1|\vec r| = \tfrac12|\vec a + \vec b| = 1 iff a,b\vec a, \vec b point the same way (the triangle inequality is tight only when collinear and equal), i.e. iff a=b\vec a = \vec b. Geometrically: the chord between two distinct surface points lies strictly inside the ball, so any nontrivial mixture is mixed; antipodal points (b=a\vec b = -\vec a) mix to the center r=0\vec r = 0.

E5 (hard). Prove that ρ=12(I+rσ)\rho = \tfrac12(I + \vec r\cdot\vec\sigma) is a valid density operator iff r1|\vec r|\le1 without computing the determinant — instead use the eigenvalue characterization of positivity directly.

Solution

ρ0\rho\succeq0 iff both eigenvalues are 0\ge0. As in E3, the eigenvalues are $\lambda_\pm = \tfrac{1\pm|\vec r|}{2}(using (using (\hat n\cdot\vec\sigma)^2 = I \Rightarroweigenvalues eigenvalues \pm1$ of n^σ\hat n\cdot\vec\sigma). The smaller one is λ=1r2\lambda_- = \tfrac{1 - |\vec r|}{2}, which is 0\ge0 iff r1|\vec r|\le1; λ+=1+r20\lambda_+ = \tfrac{1+|\vec r|}{2}\ge0 always. Hermiticity and $\operatorname{Tr}\rho = 1holdbyconstruction.So hold by construction. So \rhoisavalidstateiff is a valid state iff |\vec r|\le1$. ∎ (This matches the determinant route, since detρ=λ+λ=14(1r2)\det\rho = \lambda_+\lambda_- = \tfrac14(1 - |\vec r|^2).)

E6 (hard). The trace distance between two qubit states is $D(\rho,\sigma) = \tfrac12\operatorname{Tr}|\rho - \sigma|(halfthesumofthesingularvaluesof (half the sum of the singular values of \rho - \sigma$). Show that for single qubits D(ρ,σ)=12rsD(\rho,\sigma) = \tfrac12|\vec r - \vec s| — i.e. trace distance is just half the Euclidean distance between Bloch vectors.

Solution

ρσ=12((rs)σ)=:12(dσ)\rho - \sigma = \tfrac12((\vec r - \vec s)\cdot\vec\sigma) =: \tfrac12(\vec d\cdot\vec\sigma) with d=rs\vec d = \vec r - \vec s. This is traceless Hermitian; as in E3 its eigenvalues are ±12d\pm\tfrac12|\vec d| (eigenvalues of dσ\vec d\cdot\vec\sigma are ±d\pm|\vec d|). The singular values are the absolute eigenvalues 12d,12d\tfrac12|\vec d|, \tfrac12|\vec d|, so Trρσ=d\operatorname{Tr}|\rho - \sigma| = |\vec d| and D(ρ,σ)=12d=12rsD(\rho,\sigma) = \tfrac12|\vec d| = \tfrac12|\vec r - \vec s|. ∎ So the Bloch ball with half the Euclidean metric is the trace-distance geometry — distinguishability of qubit states is literally how far apart their Bloch vectors are. (Trace distance is developed in Term 4 / [Wil].)


Checkpoint

  1. Derive ρ=12(I+rσ)\rho = \tfrac12(I + \vec r\cdot\vec\sigma) from Hermiticity and unit trace. How do you extract rkr_k from ρ\rho?
  2. Why is the single-qubit state space a ball of radius 11? Where does r1|\vec r|\le1 come from?
  3. Which states are on the surface, in the interior, and at the center?
  4. State and derive the purity–radius identity, and give purity at r=0,12,1|\vec r| = 0, \tfrac12, 1.
  5. How does the Bloch ball relate to the pure-state Bloch sphere of Course 1.2?
Answers
  1. Hermiticity ρ=a0I+kakσk\Rightarrow \rho = a_0 I + \sum_k a_k\sigma_k with real coefficients; unit trace fixes a0=12a_0 = \tfrac12; orthogonality Tr(σjσk)=2δjk\operatorname{Tr}(\sigma_j\sigma_k) = 2\delta_{jk} gives $a_k = \tfrac12\operatorname{Tr}(\rho\sigma_k) = \tfrac12 r_k.Recover. Recover r_k = \operatorname{Tr}(\rho\sigma_k) = \langle\sigma_k\rangle$.
  2. Positivity is the only remaining constraint; detρ=14(1r2)0\det\rho = \tfrac14(1 - |\vec r|^2)\ge0 (equivalently λ±=1±r20\lambda_\pm = \tfrac{1\pm|\vec r|}{2}\ge0) forces r1|\vec r|\le1 — the closed unit ball.
  3. Surface r=1|\vec r| = 1: pure; interior 0<r<10<|\vec r|<1: mixed; center r=0|\vec r| = 0: maximally mixed ρ=I/2\rho = I/2.
  4. Tr(ρ2)=12(1+r2)\operatorname{Tr}(\rho^2) = \tfrac12(1 + |\vec r|^2) (square ρ\rho, use $(\vec r\cdot\vec\sigma)^2 = |\vec r|^2 I,trace).Values:, trace). Values: \tfrac12at at |\vec r| = 0;; \tfrac58at at |\vec r| = \tfrac12$; 11 at r=1|\vec r| = 1.
  5. The sphere (r=1|\vec r| = 1) is the pure-state boundary of Course 1.2; the ball adds the radial direction for mixed states, which point the same way but are shrunk toward the center as they lose purity/coherence.

Further Reading

  • [NC] Nielsen & Chuang, §2.4.2 and Exercise 2.72 — the Bloch-vector form $\rho = \tfrac12(I + \vec r\cdot\vec\sigma)andthe and the |\vec r|\le1$ condition.
  • [Pre] Preskill, Ph219, Ch. 2–3 — the Bloch ball, purity, and (forward to) qubit channels as affine maps of the ball.
  • [Wil] Wilde, Quantum Information Theory, Ch. 4–9 — trace distance and the Bloch picture.
  • Appendix E §1, §3 — Pauli completeness, $(\vec r\cdot\vec\sigma)^2 = |\vec r|^2 I$, and rotation exponentials.

← Prev: Partial Trace & Reduced States · Up: Term 1 · Next: Time Evolution

Ready to measure your state?

6 exercises · 10 checkpoint questions

Start the quiz